返回「私醫聯招 英文歷屆試題」題庫

私醫聯招 英文歷屆試題|第 697 題

114 學年度

In 2010, Steve Jobs made two notable statements about the iPad that revealed contrasting perspectives. Initially, he praised the device as providing “an incredible experience,” emphasizing it as the optimal tool for browsing the web — superior to laptops and smartphones. However, in a subsequent interview with a New York Times reporter, Jobs disclosed that his children had never used the iPad. He explained that his family deliberately limited their children’s use of technology at home due to concerns about potential overdependence.

Jobs’ apprehension stemmed from the addictive design of modern devices, which tech companies have intentionally optimized by removing natural stopping cues — those signals that historically encouraged users to pause or end an activity, such as finishing a magazine article or waiting for the next TV episode. By eliminating these cues through features like Netflix’s auto-play, endless social media feeds, and YouTube’s continuous video playback, companies create a seamless experience that makes disengagement difficult.

While adults may struggle with self-regulation in this environment, children face greater challenges. Young children lack the intrinsic motivation to regulate their screen time and have underdeveloped executive functions, making self-control limited. Consequently, they tend to remain engaged with screens until externally interrupted.

Addressing screen overuse requires nuanced strategies. Jobs’ strict avoidance method effectively limits exposure but may socially isolate children. Alternatively, families can impose structured screen time limits, implement app usage controls, or establish screen-free periods, such as during meals or before bedtime. These approaches rely on the psychological concept of propinquity, which posits that proximity to objects significantly influences behavior; reducing accessibility diminishes usage without requiring constant self-discipline.

Importantly, not all screen time is equivalent. Educational reading on a device differs substantially from passive social media consumption, which can contribute to feelings of loneliness or dissatisfaction. Therefore, evaluating screen time quality alongside quantity is essential in fostering healthy digital habits.

Jobs’ primary concern was not technology itself, but its potential to undermine critical skills such as willpower and interpersonal communication — challenges that remain relevant as digital devices continue to permeate children’s lives worldwide.

Which of the following examples from the passage best illustrates the psychological concept of propinquity?
  1. Steve Jobs preventing his children from using the iPad at all.
  2. Netflix introducing autoplay to encourage binge-watching.
  3. Families enforcing screen-free times, such as during dinner or before bedtime.
  4. Children enjoying reading books on iPads instead of scrolling through social media.
提示
此題考查 propinquity(鄰近性)概念的實例,對應文中「降低可及性以減少使用」的說明。
正確答案

正解:C

詳解
A. 完全禁止使用屬於嚴格避免法,而非透過降低鄰近/可及性來減少使用的作法。
B. Netflix 自動播放是移除停止提示以增加使用,方向與 propinquity(降低可及性)相反。
C. 家庭設立無螢幕時段(如用餐、睡前)正是透過降低裝置的可及性/鄰近性來減少使用,符合 propinquity 概念。
D. 此為區分螢幕時間品質的例子,與 propinquity 概念無直接關係。

查看全部題目+答案+詳解所有公開題庫

所有公開題庫(含題目與詳解全文)