返回「私醫聯招 英文歷屆試題」題庫

私醫聯招 英文歷屆試題|第 698 題

114 學年度

In 2010, Steve Jobs made two notable statements about the iPad that revealed contrasting perspectives. Initially, he praised the device as providing “an incredible experience,” emphasizing it as the optimal tool for browsing the web — superior to laptops and smartphones. However, in a subsequent interview with a New York Times reporter, Jobs disclosed that his children had never used the iPad. He explained that his family deliberately limited their children’s use of technology at home due to concerns about potential overdependence.

Jobs’ apprehension stemmed from the addictive design of modern devices, which tech companies have intentionally optimized by removing natural stopping cues — those signals that historically encouraged users to pause or end an activity, such as finishing a magazine article or waiting for the next TV episode. By eliminating these cues through features like Netflix’s auto-play, endless social media feeds, and YouTube’s continuous video playback, companies create a seamless experience that makes disengagement difficult.

While adults may struggle with self-regulation in this environment, children face greater challenges. Young children lack the intrinsic motivation to regulate their screen time and have underdeveloped executive functions, making self-control limited. Consequently, they tend to remain engaged with screens until externally interrupted.

Addressing screen overuse requires nuanced strategies. Jobs’ strict avoidance method effectively limits exposure but may socially isolate children. Alternatively, families can impose structured screen time limits, implement app usage controls, or establish screen-free periods, such as during meals or before bedtime. These approaches rely on the psychological concept of propinquity, which posits that proximity to objects significantly influences behavior; reducing accessibility diminishes usage without requiring constant self-discipline.

Importantly, not all screen time is equivalent. Educational reading on a device differs substantially from passive social media consumption, which can contribute to feelings of loneliness or dissatisfaction. Therefore, evaluating screen time quality alongside quantity is essential in fostering healthy digital habits.

Jobs’ primary concern was not technology itself, but its potential to undermine critical skills such as willpower and interpersonal communication — challenges that remain relevant as digital devices continue to permeate children’s lives worldwide.

Which of the following best describes the author’s stance on screen time for children?
  1. All screen time is harmful and should be eliminated.
  2. Screen use should be banned until adolescence.
  3. Balanced and intentional screen use can be beneficial.
  4. Only educational screen content is acceptable.
提示
此題問作者對兒童螢幕使用時間的整體立場,須綜合全文論點判斷。
正確答案

正解:C

詳解
A. 文章並未主張所有螢幕時間都有害應予以消除,而是強調品質與策略。
B. 文章並未主張應完全禁止螢幕使用至青春期。
C. 文章末段強調應評估螢幕時間的品質與數量,採取平衡且有意圖的策略,符合全文立場。
D. 文章指出教育性使用與被動社群媒體消費有別,但並未主張僅教育內容可被接受。

查看全部題目+答案+詳解所有公開題庫

所有公開題庫(含題目與詳解全文)